1/3 health research self-contradictory medical research error is much

Medical Laboratory Technician

In real life, people always can see mixed " science reminds " or " of " expert proposal, still appear even many completely contrary research results, not know what to do letting a person. And reported according to American media recently, this cannot blame medical establishment or scientist, because consider to the fault is away on official business via regular meeting in the domain in medical, this is inevitable.

Came 1990 through be opposite the 45 medicine paper that is published on journal of medical science and technology between 2003 undertakes study an analysis, does the researcher of the university make an appointment with Greek Yaoanina writing? Dr. Yaoanidisi thinks: Below a few circumstances, the " uncertainty " of a lot of healthy research needs for many times to confirm. His conclusion is: There is 1/3 about in these research is self-contradictory, perhaps be proved by the research later so not accurate.

Have profit to heart disease e.g. vitamin E, but do not have a basis actually. The research that has recently proves, vitamin E does not have curative effect to heart disease. At present Dr. Yaoanidisi already expressed this one conclusion in " American medicine association " on the magazine. Do not cross apply mechanically his theory, it seems that the data in this conclusion also is not absolutely, because research is,have fixed error rate.

About this conclusion, still have a famous case- - the understanding that people replaces therapeutics about hormone. Think it has remedial effect to heart disease and other disease at the beginning, but further research proves to do not have the effect. And, accepted at the beginning and effective fruit, because have the woman of the middle class above of healthy consciousness to think hormone has profit,be.

So, such as claret, tea, fruit and vegetable these are thought generally by people nourishing food, remedial effect how? The result is, although their effect above suspicion, but actually border effect should embrace wholesale than them people expect the value wants small much.

In the article that publishs on magazine of American medicine society and other magazine, such example cans be found everywhere. Producing this kind of " to read the account of " by accident was to emphasize one-way research overly. In fact, individual and healthy research is cannot be without what doubt ground accepts, relevant data and conclusion are included completely very hard by an article. Additional, the research that still has a lot of healthy sides relies on ego report completely, also be unscientific of course. About drinking green tea whether easing the problem with painful pharynx is such, the statistical number of all sorts of investigation is endless also and same.

Let everybody produce bewilderment and press to also have not small concern. All sorts of research are mixed in dimensions the differ in thousands ways on quality, but major media gives all sorts of research same position when the report. Actually, the error of a lot of research is put in very big difference, if do not face up to the error of research, with respect to the validity of result of may promiscuous research, and all these is reflected in press rarely come out.

When undertaking evaluating to all research, must face up to evaluation result and people the contradiction between good will- - people hopes new treatment method is effective instinctively. Sometimes they believe the value of new treatment too, so that oversight the critical opinion that concerns these therapeutics. Same, people make overreaction to the bad news normally, if saw a few people‘s vaccinal to some undesirable action reaction is excessive, meet major to the others person from same kind of advantage turn a blind eye to that gets in vaccine.

When listening to press, people often has a kind of tendency, that is a this due doubt discard at the same time, and such doing is to make his glad only just. Manage together, health research emphasis issue also often has very big discrepancy, it is the result of mutual contradiction to those appearing, undertake reasonable comparison is mixed very hard evaluate.

Face a " when people about be in black chocolate, kind when whether yellow ketone conduces to the research that drops blood pressure " , can you reach what kind of conclusion? People believes the health of this kind of chocolate research, because the chemical composition of chocolate has the sort of effect really,saying with its is, be inferior to saying is to give the food demand of chocolate of be fond of to seek a reasonable ground that looks science.

Say so, although the letter is not believed by you, but when the result that see or hears healthy research, still do not want too along with the gender, with joy too early or sniff!

Link: Laugh at nobel prize

1991, scientific and humorous magazine (Annals Of ImprobableResearch, AIR) imitates nobel prize, set an award that the name laughs at nobel prize to do, continue next up to now. This award issue every year, award prize in nobel prize about before one or 2 weeks are held, single out what look suddenly to issue laugh making a person, the research that the person saves greatly lets later.

Although by the coronal " is done laugh at Nobel " , but for the person to those bear the palm, not be the thing with ashamed what however. For the person because of scientific to be engaged in research, courage is indispensable, because be in the process of research, erring is absolutely inevitable.

This award it is a tenet in order to arouse people to scientific interest, requirement of decide on awards through discussion is " not common, humorous, have imagination " , and bear the palm person achievement also is the topic that increases at one‘s leisure to people not only, in the life that many real already ground blend in people.

Be like Du Delei of chemist of nobel prize winner? Place of sea assorted Bach says in that way: "Making the one large contribution that laughs at nobel prize is, make a person clear should not regard the scientist as sage prostrate, these vivid kinetic energy stimulate more person to generate interest to science, know we are not a flock of booby, also do not think this is profitless act only. Also do not think this is profitless act only..